The War that had been continued between Russia and Ukraine now led to face in front of International Court of Justice that ran by the Moscow’s declaration that the conflict between these two country signify genocide.
Russia rejected the orders of ICJ to get back it’s army from Ukraine. This showed the lack in powers of ICJ that wasn’t able to keep strict actions again Russia to hold it down.
Read Story In Detail
In a landmark case, Russia and Ukraine are poised for a contentious showdown at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), with Moscow asserting that its military intervention in Ukraine was a necessary response to prevent alleged genocide orchestrated by Kyiv. The roots of this dispute trace back to the 1948 UN Genocide Convention, the inaugural human rights treaty adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, symbolizing the global pledge of “never again” after the horrors of World War II.
Russia’s claims have added another layer of complexity to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. Despite previous orders from the ICJ demanding an end to Russia’s military actions in Ukraine, Moscow has persisted in its course of action. It’s essential to note that the ICJ lacks direct enforcement authority over its rulings. However, experts cited by Reuters suggest that a future ruling favoring Ukraine could have profound implications, potentially opening the door to reparations claims.
This impending legal battle at the ICJ underscores the gravity of the allegations and the international community’s commitment to addressing allegations of genocide, as outlined in the 1948 UN Genocide Convention. The outcome of this case will not only impact the immediate conflict between Russia and Ukraine but could also set a precedent for how the world addresses similar allegations of genocide in the future.